pensnest: bright-eyed baby me (Black Widow is about to make someone sor)
pensnest ([personal profile] pensnest) wrote2014-05-27 10:01 am
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

(no subject)

Oh, well done, LJ, well done.

The newest [livejournal.com profile] news post starts with: "You don't like how everything just suddenly changed with no warning or initial announcement."

No shit.

It doesn't affect my use of the site very much, since I mostly post here on DW and crossposting seems to work very well. But could they not have learned by now that such autocratic behaviour does not go over well? Seriously?
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only
sperrywink: (Default)

[personal profile] sperrywink 2014-05-27 09:56 am (UTC)(link)
It's not like its been a decade of people complaining about the same thing or anything. Sigh.

Although since I had "show in style mine" checked, I didn't notice a thing.
pensnest: bright-eyed baby me (Watson extremely dubious)

[personal profile] pensnest 2014-05-27 12:32 pm (UTC)(link)
It doesn't seem to affect me much either, as I have my own style, too. What dismays me is the great stack of log-in-with FB, Google+ etc that I have to get through in order to post a comment... when I am already logged in with LJ. Ridiculous.
turlough: computer with the text "I'm not anti-social; I'm just not user-friendly" in light blue ((other) being user friendly is overrated)

[personal profile] turlough 2014-05-27 06:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I've stopped reading LJ News but I got a mail from them with the same content. I'm very glad I hardly ever have to visit LJ these days :-)
rikes: (WTF WWF?)

[personal profile] rikes 2014-05-27 07:14 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't mind the new layout as such - it's functional and I don't spend all that much time on LJ itself - but I have to say I was quite surprised!
turps: (Default)

[personal profile] turps 2014-05-28 04:23 pm (UTC)(link)
The change was really sudden, though like most of the above it hasn't affected my own layout.

I have to hold onto hope that they admit they've a bad track record with sudden changes and are trying to change that. Goodness knows if they actually will, but at least they're admitting it.
ephemera: celtic knotwork style sitting fox (Default)

[personal profile] ephemera 2014-05-30 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I know - that really is a "stating the blindingly obvious" opener, isn't it?

[identity profile] solariana.livejournal.com 2014-05-27 10:30 am (UTC)(link)
It would have been nicer if they ask what users would like to see and work on that. It seems like they spent a lot of time and effort guessing as to what people would like and *surprising* us with it. Then asking what we thought after the fact.

I hope they continued to allow people to use the old friends page version. I tried the new version out months ago and remember not liking it much, so I immediately switched it back.

I have a lot of trouble finding things in the new version. Things that used to be one click are now 2 or 3 clicks. That is bit aggravating! How did they think that was better?
pensnest: bright-eyed baby me (Default)

[personal profile] pensnest 2014-05-27 12:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Right now as I type this comment I have a *stack* of buttons above the comment window. I can (apparently) easily comment on posts under my Facebook account, my Twitter account, my Google account, my Mail.ru account, my VKontakte account (none of which I have) or with OpenID. Which is all well and good, but I am logged in to my LJ account. Gah.

I don't use the new Friends page, though it keeps reminding me that I could. Doesn't strike me as worth the pain.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only