Thinky thoughts.
Nov. 27th, 2009 04:41 pmWe spent yesterday collecting Father in Law from Bexhill-on-Sea. He had an operation on Wednesday to correct a deformation of his foot, and we overrode his protests about how he'd be perfectly well able to look after himself and insisted he get a bit of pampering here. It shouldn't really have taken all day, but what with the hospital and the M25, well, it did.
Thing is, when female pop stars "explore their sexuality" by kissing one another on stage, that's an approved kind of outrageous. Because the straight men* like it. Women encouraging their male dancers to sniff their crotches? Straight men, not unhappy with that. Women who apparently *want* sex? No objection from the straight men.
And then we have Adam Lambert, doing much the same thing only, gasp, he's a guy! And he's not shoving his naughty bits into a woman's face (actually, he may well have done, I can't remember the details) but into a man's—oh, my, send for the smelling salts. It makes the straight men terribly, terribly uncomfortable.
I'm thinking, maybe, it's because men are persons and women are sex objects? It's acceptable for a sex object to playact sex because, well, that's what she is *for*. It's acceptable for a person (eg Justin Timberlake) to playact sex with a woman dancer, because that's what she's for. But a man who playacts sex with a man—that's person abuse!
So it's not just homophobia, it's misogyny too. Dear Adam, please not to be forgetting that.
* Straight men = not necessarily "all men who are heterosexual", more "the prevalent attitudes running our society". Lotta women seem to buy into it. :-(
Thing is, when female pop stars "explore their sexuality" by kissing one another on stage, that's an approved kind of outrageous. Because the straight men* like it. Women encouraging their male dancers to sniff their crotches? Straight men, not unhappy with that. Women who apparently *want* sex? No objection from the straight men.
And then we have Adam Lambert, doing much the same thing only, gasp, he's a guy! And he's not shoving his naughty bits into a woman's face (actually, he may well have done, I can't remember the details) but into a man's—oh, my, send for the smelling salts. It makes the straight men terribly, terribly uncomfortable.
I'm thinking, maybe, it's because men are persons and women are sex objects? It's acceptable for a sex object to playact sex because, well, that's what she is *for*. It's acceptable for a person (eg Justin Timberlake) to playact sex with a woman dancer, because that's what she's for. But a man who playacts sex with a man—that's person abuse!
So it's not just homophobia, it's misogyny too. Dear Adam, please not to be forgetting that.
* Straight men = not necessarily "all men who are heterosexual", more "the prevalent attitudes running our society". Lotta women seem to buy into it. :-(
no subject
Date: 2009-11-27 05:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-27 11:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-27 06:17 pm (UTC)I think you're onto something with the Adam business. Person abuse indeed.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-27 11:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-27 10:51 pm (UTC)Damn, I really need an Adam icon.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-27 11:51 pm (UTC)There are so many pics of Adam appearing now, how is a poor icon-maker to keep up?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-28 08:34 am (UTC)This also jives with the thread I've noticed in some of the commentary of "The kiss was unplanned! That's harassment!"
If Justin kissed a female dancer in a preformance,
a) no one would even think to ask if it was planned or not,
b) no one would ask how she felt about it, or about her sexual orientation or marital status,
c) if anyone did think to call it harassment, probably even if the dancer herself complained, they would be dismissed as over-sensitive feminists (10-to-1 odds the term "femi-nazi" would get thrown around).
no subject
Date: 2009-11-28 09:58 am (UTC)The array of reactions to this whole thing encompass a lot of mind-bogglingly stupid, really.